Heads up! I will be LIVE at the Writer’s Chatroom this Sunday, Feb. 21 from 7pm to 9pm EST. I’ll be talking about pseudonyms (I have lots), genre writing, good books, bad books, more books, and anything else you guys can think to ask. Hope to see you there!
Did somebody really try to kill George II when he was still Prince of Wales?
George II gets overlooked a lot as a do-nothing king, but when he was a prince, he and Princess Caroline were both very popular. With most people. Most of the time. There was this once though…
HISTORICAL SPOILER ALERT!!!!
“Towards the end of September 1716 he made a progress from Hampton Court to Portsmouth, distributing largess copiously all the way, held a review of the troops and inspected the ships at Portsmouth, and was everywhere received with the utmost enthusiasm. He increased his popularity by his energy in superintending the suppression of a fire at Spring Gardens on 3 December, to which he walked from St. James’s Palace in the early morning. He displayed great coolness a few days later at Drury Lane Theatre, when an assassin attempted to enter his box with a loaded pistol, and was only secured after taking the life of the guard in attendance.”
— Dr. Marjorie Bloy, “A Web of English History” quoting James McMullen Rugg, 1889 —
We are delighted to announce we have an exclusive preview of the cover for Assassin’s Masque, being the latest volume in the wholly true and entirely remarkable adventures of Margaret Preston Fitzroy, maid of honor, card-sharp, house-breaker, forger, thief of private correspondence, sometime conspiariator and confidential agent in the Court of His Majesty George I of England!
IN STORES AND ONLINE JANUARY 2016
Yes, “Careless” Mary Bellenden’s is real too. As annoying as it is to have a Molly and a Mary to keep straight, there wasn’t a lot I could do about it. Mary apparently regularly stole the show with her appearance, and her behavior. She certainly had the eye of the gentlemen poets of the day
THE HON. MARY BELLENDEN
Now to my heart the glance of Howard flies ;
Now Harvey, fair of face, I mark full well.
With thee, youth’s youngest daughter, Sweet Lepell,
I see two lovely sisters hand in hand,
The fair-haired Martha, and Teresa brown Madge Bellenden, the tallest of the land ;
And smiling Mary, soft and fair as down.
Epistle to- Mr. Pope by Gay.
Who was real resident in the Palace of Spies? Sophy Howe was. I wasn’t able to find art on her, but here’s what historian Lucy Worsely, Chief Curator at Historic Royal Palaces has to say about Sophy in her book Courtiers (a book I highly recommend if you want to know more about what was really going on at Court).
Ever wonder which of the characters in Palace of Spies was a real person? Quite a lot of them were. Starting with Peggy’s BFF at court: Molly Lepell.
WARNING! There’s actually a spoiler in this…
Molly was Maid of Honour to Caroline. She was nicknamed ‘the Schatz’, German for ‘treasure’.
She was renowned for her beauty, her elegant figure, her big grey ‘soft and sprightly’ eyes and her lustrous skin. Sprightly and fun-loving as well as being well educated and intelligent, Molly learnedto carefully disguised her learnedness at court.
She secretly married Lord Hervey in 1720. Married maids were forced to relinquish their positions, something Molly could not afford to do. After marriage, and perhaps as a result of her husband’s infidelities, Molly missed the chase and scandal of being pursued by men.
‘Bright Venus yet never sat bedded,
So perfect a beau and a belle,
As when Hervey the handsome was wedded,
to the beautiful Molly Lepell,
– Chesterfield and Pulteney
For more on the historical Molly Lepell, check out this great site.
Happy Book Day to all who celebrate! In honor of the release of DANGEROUS DECEPTIONS, not to mention the paperback of PALACE OF SPIES, I thought I’d post the lovely trailer the folks at HMH created to help introduce the world to Peggy Fitzroy, spy, card sharp, housebreaker, impersonator of persons of quality and maid of honor to Her Royal Highness, the Princess of Wales…
THIS POST CONTAINS SPOILERS!
You read that up there about the spoilers right? Right. Okay.
I saw the original Disney Sleeping Beauty in the movie theater. I was 9. Disney was doing one of it’s periodic re-releases of its classic animated features, and Mom took me as a reward for having memorized my multiplication tables up to 6. I never saw the ending (at least in the theater), because Mom also had to haul me out of the theater because when Maleficent turned into the dragon I started screaming in terror.
So, me and that bad fairy, we got history.
I took my son to see Maleficent this weekend, just in case one of us needed a hand to hold. I’m 47 now, he’s 12. He loved it and didn’t scream once, although he did hide his eyes a couple times. Me? I was deeply interested in what I was seeing.
It was a Disney production all the way, which meant it looked spectacular and plot-wise was about as subtle as a gold-plated brick upside the head. I epxected that. What I did not expect was to see a movie that would not have been made 20 years ago, possibly not even 10, DEFINITELY not when I was 9. And I am not talking about the special effects, which were massively impressive. Or the fact that I finally saw a Fairyland that really convinced me (God, I hope Brian Froud got royalties for those little guys). I’m talking about the character arc for Maleficent herself.
Here we had a powerful woman, she is stated to be THE most powerful fairy of her time. She’s is the protector for her people. She’s good at it. She is betrayed and she gets angry, fully, completely, furiously, vengefully, angry, and because of her anger, she makes a mistake. A biggie. She realizes it, eventually, and works to correct it.
Now, here’s the amazing part. She does correct it. She fixes her mistake and she regains all her powers. She is not in the end damaged, weakened, chastened or dead, the traditional choice of movie fates for a powerful woman who has realized she has made a mistake. She is never once lectured by a man (okay, maybe a little by her servant). When she chooses to forgive the bad guy, it’s after she’s regained her powers and she knows herself to be strong and him to be weak and pathetic (he dies anyway because he can’t walk away from the fight, and I’m okay with that). She is not rescued by a man, but by the other female lead and because she’s strong enough to hold out in the fight (and it’s a nasty fight) long enough for help to arrive.
She’s a mother figure who is competent at mothering, and yet does not have to die to save the child. I was really afraid of that, because that’s what happens to strong mother figures in genre media. They die for their kids. She didn’t have to die. She didn’t even have to live crippled.
Here’s the other reason I was afraid M. was going to end up dead or severely weakened at the end. There’s a scene which is clearly a stand in for a date rape during which M. is drugged and has her wings cut off. Now, in classic lit and a whole whopping great load of movies what happens when a woman is raped, or lets herself get seduced by the wrong guy, or falls for a guy who later trades his affections for someone else, or otherwise makes a mistake involving sex and/or love is she dies. Maybe she lives for awhile weakened, and chastened in saintly retreat, but mostly she dies. She doesn’t heal. She certainly doesn’t come out on the other side with her full strength back, ready and able to not only face the world but love again.
This is new. This is huge. Not because it hasn’t been done elsewhere, but because it’s Disney doing it. EVERYTHING The Mouse does is safe. It’s audience tested to hell and gone. It is calculated NOT to offend. So when Disney thinks its okay to subvert the images of women with power, to show a full-blown traditional hero’s arc from anger to mistake to triumphant return to power, we know there’s been a real change.
This is also the second Disney Blockbuster in rapid succession (the other being Frozen) where it is acknowledged that the affection women have for each other (mother-stand-in/daughter in this case) is as strong, as real, as “true” as heterosexual love between men and women. This is also new and huge in a medium that is still not comfortable with showing two women on screen at the same time having a conversation about something other than a white guy, or having an unequal power relationship that does not involve one of them being a stone-cold bitch who needs to be humiliated before then end.
Now, this was not a flawless movie. As far as the writing went, it was a finely crafted piece of Swiss Cheese. The 3 Pixies were a huge disappointment. One of the things I loved about the original was those goofy little fairies when it came down to it were extremely powerful (turn a whole rain of missels into flowers? No problem. We got this.) But in this they were just limp really limp comic relief. And the king really needed to fire whoever was in charge of the spinning wheel destruction committee. Also, I had to tell myself firmly that traditionally, fairies do not play well with each other, which might explain why none of them got together and said “Uh? Mal? You’ve been acting a little strange lately, anything you want to talk about?”
Still, I submit that in terms of shifts in the image of women and power, of whether women are worthy to hold and wield power even if they make mistakes, of the RIGHT of women to hold power, this movie, along with Frozen mark a significant pop-culture moment.
Plus, those wings? Seriously, astoundingly kick-butt.